<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: AT&amp;T-MetroFi win Riverside muni Wi-Fi bid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuniWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speculation surrounds reported Qwest RFP</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7045</link>
		<dc:creator>MuniWireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speculation surrounds reported Qwest RFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Not long ago, we reported that AT&amp;T is working with officials in Riverside, Ca.¬†It&#8217;s clear that incumbents have much more to gain by partnering with municipal governments than by trying to defeat their proposals.¬†New competitors nibbling¬†at incumbent territory threaten to gain holds in major markets where telcos refuse to play. For instance, Earthlink‚Äôs partnership in San Francisco, bogged down though it is in negotiations, is a case in point. &#8212; Carol Ellison   In Municipal Wireless, Municipal Wireless/Bids, Community/Guest Commentary Posted Tuesday, January 2, 2007 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not long ago, we reported that AT&amp;T is working with officials in Riverside, Ca.¬†It&#8217;s clear that incumbents have much more to gain by partnering with municipal governments than by trying to defeat their proposals.¬†New competitors nibbling¬†at incumbent territory threaten to gain holds in major markets where telcos refuse to play. For instance, Earthlink‚Äôs partnership in San Francisco, bogged down though it is in negotiations, is a case in point. &#8212; Carol Ellison   In Municipal Wireless, Municipal Wireless/Bids, Community/Guest Commentary Posted Tuesday, January 2, 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riverside Wi-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7044</link>
		<dc:creator>Riverside Wi-Fi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7044</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The City of Riverside owns and operates its own municipal utility system which includes electric service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The city owns and maintains the sub-stations, grid, poles and vaults.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Something that is not widely known is that Riverside Muncipal Utilities has deployed a city-wide fiber system. Charter Communications (the incumbent cable company) partially leases the city owned and operated fiber system to provide internet services to their Rverside customers under a separate agreement from the cable television franchise agreement. Charters equipment actually sits in the electrical cabinents throughout the city.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe Riverside will be the first city in the nation where the incumbent Telco and Cable company will be sharing the same infrastructure to deploy high-speed internet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, AT&amp;T and the former SBC and Pacific Bell have their own poles within Riverside, but the approved RFP calls for AT&amp;T to deploy using the municipal utility infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This RFP also has a low-income requirement built in that requires free computers and no/low cost wireless cards. I have not seen that requirement in other RFP&#039;s for city-wide Wi-Fi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some new things in the Riverside RFP that are worth watching in six, nine, twelve and eighteen months from deployment and look back to review if the extrea goodies have been deployed, or does the winning bidder(s) cry for mercy to the city council that they can&#039;t provide free wireless on an ad-supported basis and the low-income component for free equipment is killing them revenue wise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My gut tells me the bidders will be back during the contract asking for a change in terms. No evidence to support this, other than a gut feeling and you read it here first!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The City of Riverside owns and operates its own municipal utility system which includes electric service.</p>
<p>The city owns and maintains the sub-stations, grid, poles and vaults.</p>
<p>Something that is not widely known is that Riverside Muncipal Utilities has deployed a city-wide fiber system. Charter Communications (the incumbent cable company) partially leases the city owned and operated fiber system to provide internet services to their Rverside customers under a separate agreement from the cable television franchise agreement. Charters equipment actually sits in the electrical cabinents throughout the city.</p>
<p>I believe Riverside will be the first city in the nation where the incumbent Telco and Cable company will be sharing the same infrastructure to deploy high-speed internet.</p>
<p>Of course, AT&amp;T and the former SBC and Pacific Bell have their own poles within Riverside, but the approved RFP calls for AT&amp;T to deploy using the municipal utility infrastructure.</p>
<p>This RFP also has a low-income requirement built in that requires free computers and no/low cost wireless cards. I have not seen that requirement in other RFP&#8217;s for city-wide Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>Some new things in the Riverside RFP that are worth watching in six, nine, twelve and eighteen months from deployment and look back to review if the extrea goodies have been deployed, or does the winning bidder(s) cry for mercy to the city council that they can&#8217;t provide free wireless on an ad-supported basis and the low-income component for free equipment is killing them revenue wise.</p>
<p>My gut tells me the bidders will be back during the contract asking for a change in terms. No evidence to support this, other than a gut feeling and you read it here first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetroFi lands ATT contract &#171; Technically Speaking</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7043</link>
		<dc:creator>MetroFi lands ATT contract &#171; Technically Speaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MetroFi just landed a nice contract with ATT to do their Riverside area. Metro WiFi just received a boost; Technically Speaking at least. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MetroFi just landed a nice contract with ATT to do their Riverside area. Metro WiFi just received a boost; Technically Speaking at least. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; MetroFi&#8217;s Mo Money</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7042</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; MetroFi&#8217;s Mo Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7042</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The municipal wireless startup MetroFi that champions the free ad-supported WiFi model has been in the spotlight recently, though not all of it rosy. The company turned on its Foster City, California WiFi network this week, and won a contract with AT&amp;T to cover Riverside. CEO Chuck Haas even told us yesterday that the company quietly raised a series B round of $6 million in funding from the Sevin Rosen Fund and August Capital in June to bring the company&#8217;s total funding to $15 million (the website still says $9 million series A). [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The municipal wireless startup MetroFi that champions the free ad-supported WiFi model has been in the spotlight recently, though not all of it rosy. The company turned on its Foster City, California WiFi network this week, and won a contract with AT&amp;T to cover Riverside. CEO Chuck Haas even told us yesterday that the company quietly raised a series B round of $6 million in funding from the Sevin Rosen Fund and August Capital in June to bring the company&#8217;s total funding to $15 million (the website still says $9 million series A). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; MuniFi Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7041</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; MuniFi Monday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7041</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Municipal wireless networks are a polarizing technology. In any given Google search you can find some championing the benefits of city-wide networks, while others just as loudly decree the business model as shoddy. That doesn&#8217;t seem to stop cities from wanting the networks &#8212; today Boston turned on a section of its downtown WiFi network, built and run by SkyPilot Networks and Galaxy Internet. Foster City also launched a network from MetroFi today. Tomorrow the Riverside city council will consider the muniFi bid from AT&amp;T and MetroFi. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Municipal wireless networks are a polarizing technology. In any given Google search you can find some championing the benefits of city-wide networks, while others just as loudly decree the business model as shoddy. That doesn&#8217;t seem to stop cities from wanting the networks &#8212; today Boston turned on a section of its downtown WiFi network, built and run by SkyPilot Networks and Galaxy Internet. Foster City also launched a network from MetroFi today. Tomorrow the Riverside city council will consider the muniFi bid from AT&amp;T and MetroFi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: becca vargo daggett</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2006/10/15/update-atandt-metrofi-win-riverside-muni-wi-fi-bid/#comment-7040</link>
		<dc:creator>becca vargo daggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5360#comment-7040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone know if AT&amp;T owns most of the pole attachment rights in Riverside, as it does in Springfield?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if AT&amp;T owns most of the pole attachment rights in Riverside, as it does in Springfield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

