<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: St. Cloud ranked no. 1 metro Wi-Fi deployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/01/26/st-cloud-ranked-no-1-metro-wi-fi-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/01/26/st-cloud-ranked-no-1-metro-wi-fi-deployment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=st-cloud-ranked-no-1-metro-wi-fi-deployment</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Aimone</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/01/26/st-cloud-ranked-no-1-metro-wi-fi-deployment/#comment-7424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Aimone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5581#comment-7424</guid>
		<description>Would be interesting to see what criteria and tests these boys did to determine performance.
Would also like to know if they considered cost/node to install and cost/node/mo to maintain ??
These are key for us in the Service Provider business and will also be for the Munipality as these networks grow and they need to step in and support their providers as they expand or upgrade their network to deal with real world use.
In short anyone can deploy a Node/AP every 500 feet or so and include a Gateway every 3rd Node/AP and get great performance.
Just love it when vendors say that the best networks are the ones with the most Nodes/Sq Mile-What great spin.

Jacomo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be interesting to see what criteria and tests these boys did to determine performance.<br />
Would also like to know if they considered cost/node to install and cost/node/mo to maintain ??<br />
These are key for us in the Service Provider business and will also be for the Munipality as these networks grow and they need to step in and support their providers as they expand or upgrade their network to deal with real world use.<br />
In short anyone can deploy a Node/AP every 500 feet or so and include a Gateway every 3rd Node/AP and get great performance.<br />
Just love it when vendors say that the best networks are the ones with the most Nodes/Sq Mile-What great spin.</p>
<p>Jacomo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Juch</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/01/26/st-cloud-ranked-no-1-metro-wi-fi-deployment/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Juch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=5581#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>Just a note about the St. Cloud, FL Network. These performance tests were run when the network was not optimal. We are anticipating some new network optimization efforts in the next few months that will dramatically enhance the performance of the network. This network was designed and Implemented by Hewlett-Packard Mobility, Voice and Network Solutions Organization (MVNSO).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note about the St. Cloud, FL Network. These performance tests were run when the network was not optimal. We are anticipating some new network optimization efforts in the next few months that will dramatically enhance the performance of the network. This network was designed and Implemented by Hewlett-Packard Mobility, Voice and Network Solutions Organization (MVNSO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

