Ricochet Networks, a company with a long and legendary history in Internet data services, has announced plans to include Wi-Fi mesh with its complement of mobile services in the city and county of Denver, Colo.Ricochet Networks, a company with a long and legendary history in Internet data services, has announced plans to include Wi-Fi mesh with its complement of mobile services in the city and county of Denver, Colo.
Think of it as a prelude for what’s to come. In its , Ricochet said it would offer the service to commercial customers before extending it to residential users.
But that does not rule out Ricochet’s interest in courting municipalities as customers. And today, when I spoke with Ricochet President Judi Evans about that possibility, she said Ricochet is definitely in the muni business.The company, she said, is pursuing a two-fold business model for the muni-market:
Evans told me Ricochet is looking especially at markets where Wi-Fi and WiMax, as well as 4.9 public safety technologies, can compliment Ricochet’s existing MCDN high-speed cellular data network. “We’re layering in additional service offerings,” she said, and the Wi-Fi service in Denver is the first evidence of that. The goal, she said is “to be able to deliver these end to end networks.”
As such, the company–which pioneered the first U.S. nationwide wireless data network at the end fo the 1990s–is now emerging as a competitor to EarthLink, MetroFi, AT&T and others in the space.
“Our focus right now is Denver but we’re actively pursuing other markets,” Evans told me. Denver presently has an RFP out for a public safety wireless solution and, although Evans would not comment on Ricochet’s interest in it, she also did not rule it out. Responses are due April 20.
Ricochet’s announcement followed a that it was rolling out its WiMAX network in Denver and other cities around the country.
I asked Ricochet President Judi Evans if Ricochet was exploring synergies with Sprint-Nextel in the Denver market. She said they were not but “would love an opportunity to support them.”
Many of you, I’m sure, remember the old Ricochet. Back in the 1990s, when it was owned by Metricom, Ricochet rode with other high-flyers on the Internet bubble, offering the first nationwide mobile data subscription service in the U.S. But not long after the millennium clicked over, in August, 2001, the company filed bankruptcy with 51,000 subscribers and a trail of debt that topped $1 billion. It resurfaced as a hero one month later when former Metricom employees responded to the attack on the World Trade Center by re-lighting the company’s MicroCellular Data Network (MCDN) to provide emergency data services to rescue and recovery teams after traditional communications were destroyed in the buildings’ collapse.
In 2004, TeraBeam purchased Ricochet and its national cellular data and, one year later, bought Proxim Wireless. Today the cellular network remains dormant except in Denver and San Diego where Ricochet providesMCDN service. Terabeam, however, has made no secret of its intent to light up again in other markets and expand its present reach geographically and technologically. The following is text that I copied and pasted from its web site.






It’s about time Ricochet found a way to get into the Municipal Wireless game although I’d have to think this is the kiss of death to Proxim’s chances of selling gear into a major ISP now. Unless of course the plan is to win a market, build it, and then sell the ISP business off.
Its always good to see Ricochet jump back into the market. Everyone in the industry knows that Ricochet – (“Metricom”) is on their last leg. Let‚Äôs just hope they don’t try a “build it and they will come” or “brute force attack” on the market. To many in the industry, Ricochet is considered to be the fire that started the Municipal Wireless Market. Mainly because they where ahead of their time. Some of the main failures for Metricom before they where purchased out of bankruptcy and re-branded as Ricochet is that they failed to build the necessary synergies from early on. That is, they didn’t (a) identify the key stakeholders within the community ‚Äì small, medium, and large businesses – build political alliances ‚Äì or conduct the necessary marketing; (b) identify what competing technologies existed in the market – - i.e. before they went bust, they provided 28 kbps data services on a proprietary “micro cellular data network” – while incumbent Telecom‚Äôs and Cable operators provided broadband data rates at a significantly lower price ‚Äì which was standard based; and (c) spent a considerable amount of money on rights-of-way and utility agreements. Lets just hope they can learn to leverage their existing network infrastructure that isn’t currently in use and/or strewn and dangling off of vertical assets throughout the nation.