<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newcomer picked to deploy largest U.S. muni wireless net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack T</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-24772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-24772</guid>
		<description>The only thing I can say is, &quot;oh no&quot;. This is the company that recently was supposed to build a network in Trenton, NJ but now my best guess would be that this Long Island deal will delay e-path&#039;s other build outs for years. I live nearby and use another small wireless &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bamnet.com&quot;&gt;Internet access provider&lt;/a&gt; for my wifi and was looking forward to having another provider in town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I can say is, &#8220;oh no&#8221;. This is the company that recently was supposed to build a network in Trenton, NJ but now my best guess would be that this Long Island deal will delay e-path&#8217;s other build outs for years. I live nearby and use another small wireless <a href="http://www.bamnet.com">Internet access provider</a> for my wifi and was looking forward to having another provider in town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-21792</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-21792</guid>
		<description>‚Ä¢ Posted by Carol Ellison at 1:08 AM on August 17, 2007 

Update Newcomer picked to deploy largest U.S. muni wireless net  
 
This article is flawed and embarrassing, please do your homework properly;


Keyspan is a gas delivery provider, whom is about to be taken over by an English conglomerate.

LIPA (Long Island Power Authority) is the Electric Provider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‚Ä¢ Posted by Carol Ellison at 1:08 AM on August 17, 2007 </p>
<p>Update Newcomer picked to deploy largest U.S. muni wireless net  </p>
<p>This article is flawed and embarrassing, please do your homework properly;</p>
<p>Keyspan is a gas delivery provider, whom is about to be taken over by an English conglomerate.</p>
<p>LIPA (Long Island Power Authority) is the Electric Provider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry McNeill</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-21479</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-21479</guid>
		<description>IT really bugs me to see people question other peoples motives for how they want to design and deploy networks using their OWN money. Leave these guys alone or put up your own cash and go do the network. In the end, the county will have a say as to whether they met the terms of the agreement. I applaud them for taking on such an ambitious project while everyone else sits on the sidelines and criticizes motives, business models, etc. Go e-path. and good luck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT really bugs me to see people question other peoples motives for how they want to design and deploy networks using their OWN money. Leave these guys alone or put up your own cash and go do the network. In the end, the county will have a say as to whether they met the terms of the agreement. I applaud them for taking on such an ambitious project while everyone else sits on the sidelines and criticizes motives, business models, etc. Go e-path. and good luck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-21383</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-21383</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very curious about the priorities for addressing the digital divide. THat was to be a priority of the counties and yet The Times article says free service and signal boosters will go to those who qualify under federal poverty guidelines. Those guidelines are notoriously inadequate for the east coast in general and Long Island in particular because the cost of living in the area is so much higher than that of the rest of the United States. So I expect the definition of need based on those guidelines will be inadequate to help the many families just agove them. I also question the motivation of deploying service first at the Nassau Coliseum. Is the first priority really to serve concert-goers and sports fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very curious about the priorities for addressing the digital divide. THat was to be a priority of the counties and yet The Times article says free service and signal boosters will go to those who qualify under federal poverty guidelines. Those guidelines are notoriously inadequate for the east coast in general and Long Island in particular because the cost of living in the area is so much higher than that of the rest of the United States. So I expect the definition of need based on those guidelines will be inadequate to help the many families just agove them. I also question the motivation of deploying service first at the Nassau Coliseum. Is the first priority really to serve concert-goers and sports fans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Plunkett</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-21379</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Plunkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-21379</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve addressed some of these questions and comments on my blog:
http://www.cedx.com/2007/08/some-answers-to.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve addressed some of these questions and comments on my blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.cedx.com/2007/08/some-answers-to.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cedx.com/2007/08/some-answers-to.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme Vos</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/16/newcomer-picked-to-deploy-largest-u-s-muni-wireless-net/#comment-21359</link>
		<dc:creator>Esme Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6332#comment-21359</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that one of the partners in the consortium owns a fiber network without fiber, it&#039;s hard to see how a muyni wireless network can deliver the kind of bandwidth that people expect. 

What I&#039;d like to know is whether KeySpan will use the wireless network for automated meter reading and other utility applications. Corpus Christi, Texas built a citywide Wi-Fi network ($25M) using its own money because it uses the network primarily for wireless AMR. Corpus Christi outsourced the public access portion of the network to EarthLink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that one of the partners in the consortium owns a fiber network without fiber, it&#8217;s hard to see how a muyni wireless network can deliver the kind of bandwidth that people expect. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like to know is whether KeySpan will use the wireless network for automated meter reading and other utility applications. Corpus Christi, Texas built a citywide Wi-Fi network ($25M) using its own money because it uses the network primarily for wireless AMR. Corpus Christi outsourced the public access portion of the network to EarthLink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

