<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two more EarthLink deployments on hold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/23/two-more-earthlink-deployments-on-hold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/23/two-more-earthlink-deployments-on-hold/</link>
	<description>Municipal wireless, citywide WiFi, WiMAX, broadband news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dynamic</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2007/08/23/two-more-earthlink-deployments-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-21818</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dynamic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muniwireless.sandboxdev.com/?p=6347#comment-21818</guid>
		<description>As Sprint found out trying to sell its 2.5GHz service from Mt. San Bruno, wireless is just not economical enough for the operator to maintain. They weren&#039;t recovering their cost of installation from a year&#039;s worth of fees, and so they quit selling the product. Imagine managing tens of thousands of subscriptions, 10% of which are acting up or generating trouble calls at all times. The technology, unfortunately, is simply not robust enough for the uses to which it&#039;s trying to be put.

A GSM cell system would have filled SF&#039;s wireless bid spec, but no GSM providers were invited. Use the right wireless technology or don&#039;t bother - please. Now that Optical Fiber is so dramatically cheap, all the people pushing wifi have to catch up and retool - and many, including the SF Mayor, will still refuse to abandon wifi, out of ignorant stubbornness, or just ignorance.

We want a service that works - well. Fiber will do that handsomely; wifi doesn&#039;t stand a chance of delivering uniform service, even to a single user. Of course companies that thought they were going to get rich from wifi are backing out: there&#039;s no confidence there anymore - but we knew that would happen far in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sprint found out trying to sell its 2.5GHz service from Mt. San Bruno, wireless is just not economical enough for the operator to maintain. They weren&#8217;t recovering their cost of installation from a year&#8217;s worth of fees, and so they quit selling the product. Imagine managing tens of thousands of subscriptions, 10% of which are acting up or generating trouble calls at all times. The technology, unfortunately, is simply not robust enough for the uses to which it&#8217;s trying to be put.</p>
<p>A GSM cell system would have filled SF&#8217;s wireless bid spec, but no GSM providers were invited. Use the right wireless technology or don&#8217;t bother &#8211; please. Now that Optical Fiber is so dramatically cheap, all the people pushing wifi have to catch up and retool &#8211; and many, including the SF Mayor, will still refuse to abandon wifi, out of ignorant stubbornness, or just ignorance.</p>
<p>We want a service that works &#8211; well. Fiber will do that handsomely; wifi doesn&#8217;t stand a chance of delivering uniform service, even to a single user. Of course companies that thought they were going to get rich from wifi are backing out: there&#8217;s no confidence there anymore &#8211; but we knew that would happen far in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
