The
Fowler says “we have a lot of interested investors, but it’s a matter of assembling the right group. We don’t want someone coming in for a quick buck. We want someone who will stay with us for a few years.” City officials quoted in the story say they are willing to work with Sacramento Metro Connect to insure the project gets built. Construction was to have begun last month.
Glenn Fleishman notes that the consortium, which includes IBM and Cisco, is not self-funding. In spite of the deep pockets of those corporate partners, Sacramento Metro Connect has had to find its own investments for the project. Here, as in other deployments which have run into trouble, the question facing investors is whether the required investment can produce expected returns.
That was the fundamental problem in the equation behind EarthLink’s retreat from the market. The
Those comparisons are somewhat dated in light of the fact that a number of cities, including Houston and Chicago, have announced plans to proceed with muni wireless deployments. What seems to be evolving is a scenario where munis are revising their expectations and focusing on applications that will produce cost-saving efficiencies for the cities. This requires a completely different business model than those that focus primarily on providing consumer services.
Click here to read the story.








No comments yet.