Comments on: Wireless meter reading expected to save $18.7M http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/03/09/wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: deanna http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/03/09/wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m/#comment-43833 deanna Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:59:10 +0000 http://www.muniwireless.com/applications/2008/03/09/wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m/#comment-43833 would a high pressure home of atleast 90psi cause a residence with a leak at 10gals per min to over register the leak causing a $5,000 water bill for a month? thanks, Deanna would a high pressure home of atleast 90psi cause a residence with a leak at 10gals per min to over register the leak causing a $5,000 water bill for a month? thanks, Deanna

]]> By: Chris Gallaty http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/03/09/wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m/#comment-33593 Chris Gallaty Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:01 +0000 http://www.muniwireless.com/applications/2008/03/09/wireless-meter-reading-expected-to-save-187m/#comment-33593 Here's hoping that Minneapolis (MN) picks up on this. I have not had a POTS line for years. The solution in Minneapolis is to have someone *drive* around and take readings wirelessly. (As opposed to the default method where your meter is plugged into your POTS and does a 'phone home') Granted, retooling is spendy, but you would think the saving would add up. Here’s hoping that Minneapolis (MN) picks up on this. I have not had a POTS line for years. The solution in Minneapolis is to have someone *drive* around and take readings wirelessly. (As opposed to the default method where your meter is plugged into your POTS and does a ‘phone home’)

Granted, retooling is spendy, but you would think the saving would add up.

]]>