Comments on: You guys are cheap: WiMAX service for no more than $20 per month http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/05/25/you-guys-are-cheap-wimax-service-for-no-more-than-20-per-month/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=you-guys-are-cheap-wimax-service-for-no-more-than-20-per-month Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Esme Vos http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/05/25/you-guys-are-cheap-wimax-service-for-no-more-than-20-per-month/#comment-34012 Esme Vos Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:26 +0000 http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=7764#comment-34012 Paul, If the WiMAX operator sells hourly and daily subscriptions, as the Wi-Fi operators do, then I am more inclined to purchase access. Of course by that time, I hope the iPhone and Macbook Pro has a WiMAX chip. There are rumors that Apple will put WiMAX in their devices very soon. Paul,

If the WiMAX operator sells hourly and daily subscriptions, as the Wi-Fi operators do, then I am more inclined to purchase access. Of course by that time, I hope the iPhone and Macbook Pro has a WiMAX chip. There are rumors that Apple will put WiMAX in their devices very soon.

]]> By: Paul Kapustka http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/05/25/you-guys-are-cheap-wimax-service-for-no-more-than-20-per-month/#comment-34010 Paul Kapustka Sun, 25 May 2008 17:05:42 +0000 http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=7764#comment-34010 I think that mobile will actually be attractive in big cities -- but maybe more on a per-day use like Wi-Fi plans. I'd be interested to see another poll about whether people would get more use out of local vs. national or international roaming. Sprint has said local is a bigger user base, but is that true? I think that mobile will actually be attractive in big cities — but maybe more on a per-day use like Wi-Fi plans. I’d be interested to see another poll about whether people would get more use out of local vs. national or international roaming. Sprint has said local is a bigger user base, but is that true?

]]>