<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Long Island Wi-Fi project is doomed: lessons from Fire Island</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/08/25/why-the-long-island-wi-fi-project-is-doomed-lessons-from-fire-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/08/25/why-the-long-island-wi-fi-project-is-doomed-lessons-from-fire-island/</link>
	<description>Municipal wireless, citywide WiFi, WiMAX, broadband news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S.R. Stasio</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/08/25/why-the-long-island-wi-fi-project-is-doomed-lessons-from-fire-island/comment-page-1/#comment-35301</link>
		<dc:creator>S.R. Stasio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=8108#comment-35301</guid>
		<description>I think tax payers would be willing to pony up the dough for a reliable wireless network. I see enough people in Suffolk and Nassau counties usings their portable machines outdoors and at wi-fi hot spots. Cablevision should work with the local government to make the network an affordable reality. That would go againsts the interests of their corporate benefactors tho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tax payers would be willing to pony up the dough for a reliable wireless network. I see enough people in Suffolk and Nassau counties usings their portable machines outdoors and at wi-fi hot spots. Cablevision should work with the local government to make the network an affordable reality. That would go againsts the interests of their corporate benefactors tho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/08/25/why-the-long-island-wi-fi-project-is-doomed-lessons-from-fire-island/comment-page-1/#comment-35164</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=8108#comment-35164</guid>
		<description>Craig is certainly correct about the unsustainable business model. 

But in my opinion, the real reason the Long Island WiFi project failed is, quite simply, the short-sightedness and arrogance of the two county executives involved, Steve Levy and Tom Suozzi. When I read Levy&#039;s comments in Newsday after the deal was announced, to the effect of &quot;if it fails, it&#039;s no big deal because we&#039;re not investing any money,&quot; you had to know this was set up for failure. Of course, Suffolk and Nassau could have committed to being anchor tenants for such important, potentially money-saving apps like public safety and voice over WiFi, and EVENTUALLY piggybacked on the infrastructure for public access if and when a business model emerged that made sense. But that would have meant spending some money, and neither of the politicians ever really &quot;got&quot; wireless from the standpoint of those applications. It was always about free public access, which politicians will always get behind because it&#039;s political candy and easy to claim credit for -- even if it never happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig is certainly correct about the unsustainable business model. </p>
<p>But in my opinion, the real reason the Long Island WiFi project failed is, quite simply, the short-sightedness and arrogance of the two county executives involved, Steve Levy and Tom Suozzi. When I read Levy&#8217;s comments in Newsday after the deal was announced, to the effect of &#8220;if it fails, it&#8217;s no big deal because we&#8217;re not investing any money,&#8221; you had to know this was set up for failure. Of course, Suffolk and Nassau could have committed to being anchor tenants for such important, potentially money-saving apps like public safety and voice over WiFi, and EVENTUALLY piggybacked on the infrastructure for public access if and when a business model emerged that made sense. But that would have meant spending some money, and neither of the politicians ever really &#8220;got&#8221; wireless from the standpoint of those applications. It was always about free public access, which politicians will always get behind because it&#8217;s political candy and easy to claim credit for &#8212; even if it never happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog - WeFi&#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2008/08/25/why-the-long-island-wi-fi-project-is-doomed-lessons-from-fire-island/comment-page-1/#comment-35083</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog - WeFi&#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=8108#comment-35083</guid>
		<description>[...] Plunkett has written a good commentary on why the Long Island, NY countywide Wi-Fi project is doomed. Craig is the founder of CEDX, has set up Wi-Fi service on the Hamptons Jitney, unwired Fire Island [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plunkett has written a good commentary on why the Long Island, NY countywide Wi-Fi project is doomed. Craig is the founder of CEDX, has set up Wi-Fi service on the Hamptons Jitney, unwired Fire Island [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
