<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wellington, FL deploys municipal Wi-Fi network for wireless AMR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/01/19/wellington-fl-deploys-municipal-wi-fi-network-for-wireless-amr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/01/19/wellington-fl-deploys-municipal-wi-fi-network-for-wireless-amr/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wellington-fl-deploys-municipal-wi-fi-network-for-wireless-amr</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Biba</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/01/19/wellington-fl-deploys-municipal-wi-fi-network-for-wireless-amr/#comment-37645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Biba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=9823#comment-37645</guid>
		<description>This IS definitely on the low side for node density.  But so much depends on the client and the topology.   With few trees, flat terrain and a very high power client .. this COULD work.   But it does seem to be underengineered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This IS definitely on the low side for node density.  But so much depends on the client and the topology.   With few trees, flat terrain and a very high power client .. this COULD work.   But it does seem to be underengineered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/01/19/wellington-fl-deploys-municipal-wi-fi-network-for-wireless-amr/#comment-37644</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=9823#comment-37644</guid>
		<description>Wow Tropos is now saying they can cover 40 square miles with 200 APs. That&#039;s very interesting math! With a range of 600-1000 feet per AP client service side, wouldn&#039;t you need approximately 1000 to 1200 APs? I hope all due diligence has been done here. The last thing the Muni community needs is another fiasco on our hands. I hope they are only covering critical streets and areas of mass meters. That would make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Tropos is now saying they can cover 40 square miles with 200 APs. That&#8217;s very interesting math! With a range of 600-1000 feet per AP client service side, wouldn&#8217;t you need approximately 1000 to 1200 APs? I hope all due diligence has been done here. The last thing the Muni community needs is another fiasco on our hands. I hope they are only covering critical streets and areas of mass meters. That would make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

