<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the FTC look at AT&amp;T&#8217;s 3G woes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/03/17/should-the-ftc-look-at-atts-3g-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/03/17/should-the-ftc-look-at-atts-3g-woes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-the-ftc-look-at-atts-3g-woes</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/03/17/should-the-ftc-look-at-atts-3g-woes/#comment-37947</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kapustka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=10287#comment-37947</guid>
		<description>Maybe not over the common carrier portion, but what if you define the 3G as an Internet service? The FTC already has asserted it has jurisdiction in such an arena. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.ftc.gov/opa/2006/06/broadband.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt; for an old argument.)

And lack of clear jurisdiction didn&#039;t stop the FCC from slapping at Comcast... so it&#039;s not as black and white as it seems, ever, when you are talking D.C. and lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not over the common carrier portion, but what if you define the 3G as an Internet service? The FTC already has asserted it has jurisdiction in such an arena. (See <a href="http://www2.ftc.gov/opa/2006/06/broadband.shtm" rel="nofollow">this link</a> for an old argument.)</p>
<p>And lack of clear jurisdiction didn&#8217;t stop the FCC from slapping at Comcast&#8230; so it&#8217;s not as black and white as it seems, ever, when you are talking D.C. and lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: required</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/03/17/should-the-ftc-look-at-atts-3g-woes/#comment-37943</link>
		<dc:creator>required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=10287#comment-37943</guid>
		<description>But..... Ftc by law lacks jurisdiction over common carriers.  Shoulda woulda coulda whatever... No jurisdiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;.. Ftc by law lacks jurisdiction over common carriers.  Shoulda woulda coulda whatever&#8230; No jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

