<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist on Swindon&#8217;s muni Wi-Fi plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/11/20/the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/11/20/the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans</link>
	<description>Citywide WiFi, smart grid, enterprise wireless, public safety, mobile apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/11/20/the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans/#comment-39777</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=12030#comment-39777</guid>
		<description>Unlikely a very good radio at that price. Probably an indoor 100MW radio stuck in an outdoor enclosure. 

Assuming that other Home based WiFi AP&#039;s are in the area the user experience will be bad as the noise floor will be too high. 

In english...you probably will be able to see the AP&#039;s on your &quot;available networks&quot; page but not able to talk to it with a Laptop or iPhone.... 

The vendor supplying the radios will probably be out of business within 2 to 3yrs. Big issue in the USA. Ask Spokane WA. 

You get what you pay for........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlikely a very good radio at that price. Probably an indoor 100MW radio stuck in an outdoor enclosure. </p>
<p>Assuming that other Home based WiFi AP&#8217;s are in the area the user experience will be bad as the noise floor will be too high. </p>
<p>In english&#8230;you probably will be able to see the AP&#8217;s on your &#8220;available networks&#8221; page but not able to talk to it with a Laptop or iPhone&#8230;. </p>
<p>The vendor supplying the radios will probably be out of business within 2 to 3yrs. Big issue in the USA. Ask Spokane WA. </p>
<p>You get what you pay for&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivkumar</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/11/20/the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans/#comment-39701</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivkumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=12030#comment-39701</guid>
		<description>Hi,
We are deploying 4-Radio Wireless Routers (with antennae/cable et all) at around $500 each (around 32k of them) in India. I dont see why it cant be done at 700 pounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
We are deploying 4-Radio Wireless Routers (with antennae/cable et all) at around $500 each (around 32k of them) in India. I dont see why it cant be done at 700 pounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ksenia Coffman</title>
		<link>http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/11/20/the-economist-on-swindon-muni-wifi-plans/#comment-39668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ksenia Coffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muniwireless.com/?p=12030#comment-39668</guid>
		<description>1M pounds for 1,400 APs works out to about 700 pounds per AP - and that&#039;s including the outdoor AP itself, installation, backhaul, back-end (SW &amp; HW), internet connectivity, maintenance etc. Does this sound reasonable to anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1M pounds for 1,400 APs works out to about 700 pounds per AP &#8211; and that&#8217;s including the outdoor AP itself, installation, backhaul, back-end (SW &amp; HW), internet connectivity, maintenance etc. Does this sound reasonable to anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

